Enough with the bad grammar!

Posted by:

[I thought it appropriate to follow my last blog, which dealt with the annoying overuse of the word, “guys,” to touch on a related subject, bad grammar. This post was published in the Columbus Bar Association Lawyers Quarterly magazine a few years back. Regrettably, what I wrote then is still relevant.]

In the words of a great American nautical hero, “I’ve had all I can stands. I can’t stands no more!” I’m talking about bad grammar. That’s right—bad grammar, a bad practice that is becoming commonplace. I hear TV journalists using bad grammar.  I see grammatical errors in newspapers and books. Worse yet, I hear bad grammar from lawyers.

Language is the most important tool we employ. It is the palette from which we convey ideas and the means by which we persuade and influence. Language is what our profession is all about, and we should all be masters in its use.

Where does one turn for help with grammar questions? Simple—there are plenty of resources available, and I reviewed three before writing this piece.[1] I also enjoy an advantage provided by my parents. I was rigorously schooled on the subject of grammar by the Penguins (aka Dominican nuns) during my formative years.[2]

Let’s begin with some of the more common examples of bad grammar. The first is, “Him and I played on the same softball team.” What? I hear this somewhat routinely. Would you say, “Him played on the same softball team”?[3]  Of course not. “Him” has to follow a preposition (for those of you not trained by the Penguins, prepositions are words such as “to”, “with”, “or”) and cannot be the subject of a sentence. Proper grammar demands that one say, “He and I played on the same softball team.”

Here’s an error I’m starting to hear all too frequently: “Return the book to Joe or I.”  Oh, how the grammar gods frown when they hear this. Would you say, “Return the book to I”? Of course not. You would say, “Return the book to me,” which means you should say, “Return the book to Joe or me.”

An error related to the one above is, “It is Debbie and I’s anniversary.” Agggghhh! Please stop the madness! Would you say, “It is I’s anniversary”?  Of course not.  You would say, “It is my anniversary.” There are eyes, and there are ayes, but there is no I’s. There never was, and there never will be. Who started this trend? In the world of grammar, this type of language abuse is akin to a capital crime.

Here’s one I am starting to see in the newspapers: “The couple have two children.”  Wait a minute—a couple is but one unit, and so the word “has” should be used, as in, “The couple has two children.” Don’t be led astray by the fact that a couple is composed of two people. As we say in court, that’s irrelevant.

A close cousin of this error concerns the word data.  I’m starting to see with some regularity the phrase, “The data are inconclusive.” I suppose some modern linguist concluded that, because it refers to multiple bits of information, the word data is plural. Really? So, by analogy would you say, “The army are advancing”?  Of course not.  Sure, an army is composed of many soldiers, but an army itself comprises a single unit. Besides, “the army are advancing” sounds dumb—almost as dumb as “the data are inconclusive.” “The data is inconclusive” is the way to go.

Here’s another common mistake: “If anyone calls, tell them I’m out and schedule them for a meeting.” Why use the word “them” when we’re talking about “anyone,” which refers to single person. The correct statement is, “If anyone calls, tell him I’m out and schedule him for a meeting.”  Ah, but that’s politically incorrect, some would say. To avoid any gender preference, the PC police mandate that we say, “If anyone calls, tell him or her I’m out and schedule him or her for a meeting.” Really?  This stuff makes my head explode.

Is submission to political correctness so necessary that we are forced to use stilted language? Oh, puhhhhlease. Do people really get offended over this stuff?  Doesn’t, “If anyone calls, tell him I’m out and schedule him for an appointment” sound better? Here’s my view: if anybody has a problem with what I’m saying, he can give me a call.

For those of you who feel constrained to oblige the dictates of the PC police but still strive for some modicum of eloquence, here’s another option. Try to avoid using a pronoun. “If anyone calls, please say that I’m out and schedule the caller for an appointment.” There you go—problem avoided.

I suppose you wouldn’t be surprised to know my stepson bought me a sign that reads, “I am silently correcting your grammar.” Look for the sequel, “Is there a moral imperative to correcting someone’s bad grammar in public?”

[1]  Sleeping Dogs Don’t Lay by Richard Lederer and Richard Dowis; Woe is I by Patricia T. O’Conner; Good Grief, Good Grammar by Dianna Booher.

[2]   Penguins should probably not be capitalized, but I capitalize to show respect.

[3]   Yes, I know. The placement of the question mark in this sentence raises punctuation questions. That’s an issue for another day.

__________________________________________

Jack D’Aurora writes for Considerthisbyjd.com

_________________________________________________________

 

 



Also published on Medium.

18
  Related Posts
  • No related posts found.

Comments

  1. Fil Line  August 13, 2018

    I love this. I hear this kind of stuff all the time – from professional people who should know better!! Learn to talk right, people; or, better yet, “Learn to speak correctly, colleagues”.

    I’m still lobbying for the incredible, continuous use of “no problem” or “not a problem” in place of “you’re welcome”. That one drives me up the wall.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      I don’t know sure, but I suspect that much of the problem can be attributed to inadequate education in the primary and junior high levels. And, yes, all this drives me up the wall. I’m right with you.

      reply
  2. robin  August 13, 2018

    Jack:

    Thank you for giving me grammatical guidance. I hope you write a blog on punctuation–I need help in this area.

    Robin

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      I would write about punctuation if I could figure out a way to make the piece humorous. Punctuation doesn’t lend itself to laughs.

      reply
  3. GARY ALLIETTA  August 13, 2018

    I totally agree with everything you said, but…
    My mother was an English teacher for many years, which may be why I ended up as an English major in college. She also got irritated by bad grammar, bad spelling and punctuation. However, her philosophy about writing for public consumption was that you should write to your audience, not to the Penguins. If your audience understands bad grammar and you get your point across better that way, so be it.
    My current pet peeve is journalists who use (or mis-use) the phrase “try and”, as in “the team will try and win its next game”. I suspect the writer means that the team “will try to win” its next game, but the phrase is so ingrained in common use today that no one hears the difference.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      Your mother was apparently very open minded, and perhaps hers is the right strategy. Me? I’m not that charitable. My position: speak correctly or don’t speak!

      reply
  4. Tony yacoub  August 13, 2018

    Oh boy; Going forward, I should be very careful when I write you an email.
    I think you may forgive my bad grammar since I am bilingual and was born overseas, lol

    Great article!!

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      You always get a pass with me, Tony, because you’re a good man.

      reply
  5. Steven Spring  August 13, 2018

    Thanks for the lesson, Jack, as I learned a couple of things. I must admit to hating grammar in school. If I could do it all over again, I would pay more attention. Plus, I cannot remember taking a single English class in college.

    I’m no linguist, and far from knowledgeable, but isn’t “step son” one word?

    reply
  6. Nancy Byrd  August 14, 2018

    Jack, I’m hopeful that at least some of the critical offenders will see this blog. If you are Facebook, your brain probably does explode. Drives me crazy the things I see on there! I wouldn’t even know where to start. But, thank you, I thoroughly enjoyed.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      I agree. There’s plenty of stuff on social media to make your head explode. Thanks for reading, Nancy.

      reply
  7. Bruce Lackey  August 16, 2018

    Please include “regardless” vs “irregardless” on your next post concerning grammar.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 16, 2018

      Oh, the list of grammar violations is just too long as it is. So many errors, so little time.

      reply
  8. Nychouse  August 22, 2018

    Jdaurora@behallaw.com, thanks so much for the post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 25, 2018

      I’ll keep writing. You keep reading! Thanks.

      reply
  9. Andrew Schilling  August 29, 2018

    Hello, Jack,
    I love your blog and your writing, Jack, but I’m sorry to say You’re Wrong about the use of “data” as a singular noun: “The data are inconclusive.” I suppose some modern linguist concluded that, because it refers to multiple bits of information, the word data is plural. ”
    The correct answer — that the word “data” is indeed a plural form — stems not from a modern linguist but rather on classical languages. In Latin, “datum” [a “given,” or a point of information] is a neuter 2d Declension word — which forms its plural by swapping the “um” for an “a” = DATA. Same rule applies for medium (sing.) & media (pl.). The ancient Greeks gave us similar singular to plural forms: it’s one “criterion” — and several “criteria.” [And to toss in one other point of classical language abuse: the Greek word “kudos” is actually a single form. So, “Kudos to Dave for his great work!” is really just one heaping of praise, not several; and you can’t have a single “kudo”.]
    By now you can see where the errors are going to creep into English usage. Phrases like “the media is the message:; or “The data is going to show that….”; or “The CEO chose an investment strategy based on this criteria.”
    In fairness to Jack, one can get carried away with imposing classical rules on modern English usage of Latin roots. The proper plural of “memorandum” is, you guessed it, “memoranda” — but honestly, what office manager will respond to colleagues by writing several MEMORANDA? Likewise, forum would be pluralized as “fora” — but it strikes me as ridiculously pretentious to say, “I’ve presented my ideas at several different fora.” [“What?!”]
    That said, I don’t think it’s pretentious to stick with ‘data’ as a plural. The data will back me up on that.

    And this entire discussion thread reminded me of one of my favorite lines from the Kelsey Grammer [appropriate, huh?] sitcom, “Frazier” when he tells his brother Niles, “I don’t go around correcting other people’s grammar just to be popular.”

    Finally — add the book “Eats, Shoots & Leaves” by Lynne Truss to your list of excellent language usage books.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  August 30, 2018

      A “neuter 2d Declension word?” Huh?! What?! You have just raised the intellectual level of my humble blog by a significant factor. I am humbled by your command of the language and by your kind words about my blog. Glad to have you as a reader and adjunct language expert.

      Back to the data debate. Call me stubborn, but I’m stickin’ with “the data shows.” Harrumph!

      reply
      • Ansy  August 30, 2018

        Jack, ha, thanks for your comments and, heck, it’s your blog, so you can set your own criteria! (Well, so long as they are plural!!) lol
        My next screed will be about the misuse of the word “regarrd” as in “with regards to “.,,,,, but I will leave it at that for now!

        reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.