The lesson we can learn from the moral failures of others

Posted by:

Last month’s vote on the national emergency resolution gave me pause to think about courage. We admire those who display it and criticize those who don’t. We like to give a pat on the back to those who show courage under fire, whether it be combat or the pressures of the business world.

Show me someone who has been scorned in the news for a moral failure in business or politics, and I’ll show you plenty of people eager to display the thumbs down gesture of a Roman emperor at the gladiator games.

It’s so easy to be critical, especially from a distance.

Columnist Bret Stephens criticized 41 Republican senators who voted no on the national emergency resolution to block President Donald Trump from shifting already-allocated funds to his southern border wall project. They failed, as Stephens puts it, to stand up against presidential action they “know violates the separation of powers, tramples on their legislative prerogatives, makes a mockery of long-held conservative principles, and establishes a political precedent they will come to regret bitterly and soon.”

Stephens really hit hard on Nebraska’s Ben Sasse and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis. Both initially opposed the emergency declaration, but when it became clear their opposition was politically risky, they backed down. In Stephens’ words, “It’s remarkable how quickly principles become liquid when a Senate seat is at stake.”

The flip by Sasse and Tillis should be just the beginning of the conversation for the rest of us. The real question is, how would the rest of us act when our job, our future is on the line? I wonder how I would respond.  

I think back to the story of Randy “Duke” Cunningham, who served eight years in jail for bribery. Here’s somebody who, as my dad would have said, “had life by the ass.” Cunningham was a retired Navy fighter pilot and Vietnam War ace, who downed five MiGs. He was elected to Congress in 1991, where he served until he was convicted in 2005. 

Having a Navy pension, the fame that comes with being a war hero, and the generous salary paid to a congressman weren’t enough. Cunningham thought it was a good idea to take in $2.4 million in bribes.

A friend of mine and I sometimes talk about how we would respond if we had the kind of fame and power that always seems to accompany people who make the news for the wrong reason. I always wonder, “Weren’t some of these people choir boys back in the day? Maybe the sirens of money and power are just too hard to resist for the average human being.”

Would I have the courage to blow the whistle on a good friend if I knew he was engaged in something criminal? Would I be willing to stand on principle and pass up a large payday in exchange for looking the other way?  Would I be willing to suffer criticism and make the unpopular but right decision?

My friend assures me that if you’re grounded at the start, you’ll likely do the right thing later in life, no matter how great the temptations. He assures me I have nothing to worry about.

I hope my friend is right, but I’m too aware of my own frailties to take comfort in what he says.

My takeaway from stories about people like Sasse, Tillis and Cunningham? Rather than be critical of them, I’d rather pray I have the right stuff when the time comes.

_______________________________

Jack D’Aurora writes for Considerthisbyjd.com

___________________________________________________

5
  Related Posts

Comments

  1. James Cowardin  April 8, 2019

    Your point is clear and it is a good one, and it Is well to ponder the question you ask. The example you choose for illustration, however, cheapens your effort. Choosing Republicans as foils deflects from the myriad of examples of Democrats doing just the same. You are entitled to free speech, and you are not required to exhibit fair speech, but why detract from such an otherwise honorable discussion?

    reply
    • Jim Pucci  April 11, 2019

      In a vein similar to Mr. Cowardin, I would say that while I believe that many executive acts, including this one by President Trump, overstep the authority of that branch, legislators cannot be blind to changes in the rules of the game. The fact that Trump’s predecessors (and this goes back a good way) were not held accountable for their abuses opens the door.

      I would argue that the better way to effect change would to be to abuse the authority so egregiously as to force change. Someone once said the best way to get rid of a bad law is vigorous enforcement. I think that is also true of bad practice.

      I do like that you’ve raised this issue. Now that the shoe is on the other foot perhaps Democrats will be willing to join those brave republicans that you mention in doing something to rein in the out of control executive action horse. I don’t know what they have at their disposal to do this however.

      reply
  2. Bruce Lackey  April 8, 2019

    Jack – You do not shy away from the difficult subjects!

    I believe your friend is wrong; regardless of upbringing, we are all still in a daily battle against negative influences in our mind. However, proper instruction while young, and then ongoing, will certainly prepare you to make better decisions. I think the devil can work hardest against those in higher, more visible or public positions as his payoff can be more sensational when the failure occurs.

    Changing gears, I do agree with your friend: you do not have anything to WORRY about as your victory is already won, but you must vigilant and aware at all times.

    reply
  3. Kay Georgiady  April 8, 2019

    If you want courage look to the talk given on April 7, 2019, in Washington by Mayor Pete. That is the most courage that you will find in your lifetime. It was also spoken with honesty from the heart. This man impresses every time he opens his mouth. Courage is not voting, not an ace in a plane. Courage is admitting the truth when you know you will get nothing but abuse from those that lack intelligence, of which we have many in our midst.

    reply
  4. Robert Test  April 8, 2019

    Jack, I just don’t see your example of a moral failure — Republicans violating their principles– as a moral failure.

    There clearly are various examples of moral failure: murder, telling a lie to advance your interests and resulting in harm ti others, or stealing several months wages from a family in need. Moral failures involve violation of moral principle.

    A politician violating his own principles even if they are fundamental constitutional principles is some other type of failure. We all have some sort of duty to be consistent but not every failure to be consistent is a moral failure.

    Your secondary concern about having the moral backbone or courage to do the right thing when it might cost us, or even in circumstances where there is little or no cost to us, is separate matter. I’m sure you know about the Milgram experiments and the Stanford prison experiment.

    reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.