Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor

Social Issues

Rapist case shows how court shouldn’t work

Last December, the Ohio Supreme Court in Brandt v. Pompa changed its position on a 2005 statute, Senate Bill 80, that caps non-economic damages—think pain and suffering. More stunning is how the case brings to light the politics in judicial decisions. Amanda Brandt had been sexually abused as a middle schooler by Roy Pompa, now […]

, , , ,

Rapist case shows how court shouldn’t work Read Post »

Social Issues

State should support legal aid

Is access to legal assistance for low-income Americans important? President Donald Trump doesn’t think so. His 2018 budget proposed eliminating the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), an independent nonprofit, established during the Nixon administration that provides civil legal aid to low-income Americans. Trump apparently forgot about his campaign theme—“to bring hope to every forgotten stretch of

, , , ,

State should support legal aid Read Post »

Death Penalty

Ohio death penalty task force got it right

Two years ago, in response to questions about lack of uniformity in carrying out the death penalty, Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor formed a task force to assess whether Ohio’s death penalty is being administered fairly. The task force recently announced its recommendations, and though it was a balanced group, some members criticized

, , , , , ,

Ohio death penalty task force got it right Read Post »

Judges

Chief Justice O’Connor abandons some of her ideas

The Dispatch reported today that Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor  has abandoned four of her proposals to change judicial elections. The three ideas that remain from the proposals she suggested in early 2013 are: 1) amend the constitution so that judicial elections take place in odd years, so that only judges would be

, ,

Chief Justice O’Connor abandons some of her ideas Read Post »

Judges

The Ohio State Bar Association should take a lesson from our chief justice

The Ohio State Bar Association has long supported the idea of merit appointment/retention elections for judges but has done little to actually promote the idea since the failed referendum in 1987. I don’t understand the value in the OSBA voicing support for merit appointment when our association does not actively work to achieve it. In

, , ,

The Ohio State Bar Association should take a lesson from our chief justice Read Post »

Scroll to Top