State should support legal aid

Posted by:

Is access to legal assistance for low-income Americans important? President Donald Trump doesn’t think so. His 2018 budget proposed eliminating the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), an independent nonprofit, established during the Nixon administration that provides civil legal aid to low-income Americans.

Trump apparently forgot about his campaign theme—“to bring hope to every forgotten stretch of this country.” According to former LSC president Martha Bergmark, the majority of the states with the lowest ranking for access to legal assistance for low-income citizens supported Trump.

Fortunately, most of Congress didn’t listen to Trump. In fact, Congress went a different direction and increased LSC funding in March from $385 million to $410 million.

Across the country, legal aid offices serve the needs of those whose incomes are below 125 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). For a family of four, that’s $30,740 a year. Roughly 1.5 million Ohioans fall in this category. In 2016, the 28 lawyers and staff members at the Legal Aid Society of Columbus, along with several hundred pro bono attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers, served 6609 low-income individual and families.

It’s probably difficult to imagine why those with low incomes would need a lawyer, but low income, in and of itself, generates problems.  Seventy-one percent of low income households have experienced a legal problem in the past year. For households with disabled persons, the percentage jumps to 80 percent; for households with survivors of domestic violence or sexual assault, it jumps to 97 percent.  One in four low-income households has experienced six or more legal problems in the past year.

“When living on the edge, one problem begets another,” explains Tom Weeks, executive director of the Legal Aid Society of Columbus. “Get injured on the job without health insurance or workers compensation, and suddenly you’re faced with hospital bills. Because you’re unable to work, you can’t afford to repay the auto title loan you took out for repair work, and you don’t have money for next month’s rent.

“You can afford to pay the lender or the landlord but not both. Eventually, the hospital files suit to collect on its unpaid bills. The lender and landlord will be next. It can be overwhelming.”

What’s staggering is that intimate partner violence among people with family income at or below the FPL is about four times the rate for those with incomes at or above 400 percent of the FPL. “Twenty-two percent of legal aid work is family law,” says Angie Lloyd, executive director of the Ohio Legal Assistance Foundation. “But it’s actually all domestic violence-related, so we’re only meeting part of the domestic legal need.”

Legal aid isn’t just about providing assistance. “It’s transformative work,” says Lloyd, “that allows low-income and vulnerable Ohioans to be gainfully employed, financially secure, stably housed, healthy and safe from domestic violence.”

The Access to Justice Task Force formed by Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor of the Ohio Supreme Court concluded there is a 115 percent return for every dollar invested in legal aid. “Studies consistently show that investing in civil legal aid programs has a positive economic impact.”

Even if LSC funding continues in the future, it’s not enough. LSC provides only roughly 30 percent of the budget for Ohio’s legal aid offices. Another 40 percent comes from a surcharge on court filing fees and the interest earned on lawyer trust accounts, and that money has been decreasing. With interest rates dropping over the years, revenues from trust accounts fell from $22 million in 2007 to $4 million today.

Remarkably, the state of Ohio contributes nothing to legal aid. The Ohio Supreme Court’s Task Force recommended in 2015 that the Ohio General Assembly fund the cost of the 120 legal aid attorneys and support staff who were laid off because of declining funds.

Three years later, we’re still waiting for the General Assembly to respond.

[This post was published in the Columbus Dispatch on May 27, 2018]

_________________________________________

Jack D’Aurora writes for Considerthisbyjd.com

___________________________________________________



Also published on Medium.

2
  Related Posts

Comments

  1. Dave  May 29, 2018

    Jack, I never much cared for Legal Aid, but see the general merits for such an organization. However I don’t believe the Federal Government should have ever entered that theater. Providing such services for citizens is the right and obligation of each of the various states.

    In reading your statistics, those can only be challenged. For instance, of the seventy-one percent of households that experienced a legal issue, I’d bet at least two-thrids or more are a result of violations of their lease. They have brought on the issue by their action or inaction. Not in all cases of course, but in the lion’s share.

    Think about the practical issues of using Federal money for this. Are all those in poverty evenly placed throughout the states? Are those who have been disadvantaged evenly placed among the states? Possibly a state with perceived and disproportionate levels of poverty and disadvantaged believes it should be able to look to the Federal Government for help. Maybe, but in these matters, each state should be the prime and possibly only answer for solving those problems. Likely it is policies within their own governing style that has caused the problems, such as becoming a sanctuary state.

    Maybe I got off your subject a bit, but if you want Legal Aid in Ohio, then raise your flag, your vote and your voice and plead for Ohio money to be used for that (without a related tax increase by the way). And the comment about those in poverty getting hurt on the job resulting in a legal issue? Two things wrong with that. A job injury will be covered by Workers Comp and also if not a job injury, all those highlighted families are qualified for Medicaid. No Ohioan within the poverty level should be without health insurance. If they are, it’s of their own action or inaction.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  June 3, 2018

      I can appreciate your argument that legal aid is a state, not a federal issue. I disagree, but I understand your position.

      As your conjecture that the majority of legal issues faced by low income people concerns their leases and that low-income people “have brought on the issue by their action or inaction”–I’ve seen first hand how the downward spiral happens. Low income people live paycheck to paycheck. Their world is precarious and is entirely different from where you and I are. To gain insight, you have to go into their world. It’s easy to criticize from a distance.

      reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.