New stadium scores over economic blight

Posted by:

How governments prioritize expenditures is sometimes a head-scratcher. An example is the city of Columbus’ decision to invest millions in a new soccer stadium, while a segment of the west side continues to decay.

Two weeks ago, the Columbus Dispatch ran a three-day series, “Suffering on Sullivant,” about a three mile stretch of Sullivant Avenue that suffers from prostitution, drug use and other crimes. The landscape is marked by abandoned and dilapidated houses, trash and drug paraphernalia.

A week ago, Mayor Andrew J. Ginther referred to the area as a “top priority” for his administration. City Attorney Zach Klein acknowledged the elevated crime rate in the area, and City Council President Pro Tempore Elizabeth Brown recognizes the area needs more assistance.

Excellent! But wait a minute. Something’s wrong here.

While the woes of Sullivant Avenue may have been a newsflash to many Columbus residents, this had to be old news for the city’s administration. There’s no way city officials just became aware of the problem.

Sullivant has been in a steady state of decay—for how many years?—and the city is contributing $50 million to the development of a new Crew stadium and another $50 million for nearby development projects? What am I missing? Yes, I know the argument—the Crew stadium means economic development and more jobs, but I’m always skeptical of these tradeoffs. Exactly how many long terms jobs offering more than $15 an hour will the stadium and related improvements provide?

That point aside, what about the social costs that come with Sullivant Avenue? Drugs and prostitution result in additional criminal activity—and more broken lives—which requires more police and fire fighter activity, more emergency medic time and more emergency room services, all of which affect the city’s budget.

Then there’s the continuing cycle of poverty and how it affects the area’s youth. All they know is what they see on Sullivant Avenue—nothing else—and so they fall into the same hole of just barely getting along, as best they can—crime and all.

Build a stadium? No problem. We’re on it, right now! Tackle crime, drug use, lack of education and all the other problems that exist on Sullivant Avenue? Ah, well, that’s on the list.

_________________________________

Jack D’Aurora write for Considerthisby.com

___________________________________________________

6
  Related Posts
  • No related posts found.

Comments

  1. Debbie  November 5, 2019

    And don’t forget the Linden area. Unfortunately, no one in these areas will be able to afford the Crew games (as they haven’t been able to attend many Clipper games after their move) due to the cost of parking, tickets, etc. So where do these children go for entertainment? Who do they aspire to be? Not that person kicking or batting the ball because they don’t get the opportunity to go. Their entertainment is what is going on in front of their homes. Come on, council, get with some of these non-profits and other organizations and throw money at them to help more than they are currently able to. Go to some of these organizations and work with them, experience what they see everyday. Go volunteer, etc.!

    reply
  2. Steven Spring  November 5, 2019

    I’ve long thought it rather pitiful that sporting teams hold governments (i.e., taxpayers) hostage, whining about outdated twenty-five year old arenas and stadiums all the while kids attend school in one hundred year old buildings, many of which have been condemned.

    reply
  3. David  November 5, 2019

    While we are at it, how would people in the Sullivant area get to any of those “good jobs” building the new stadium. Public transportation makes it difficult (and expensive) to get around Columbus. Job recruitment in the area with free busing directly to the job site would go a long way towards making those good jobs available. Just a thought. Thanks Mr D’Aurora.

    reply
  4. Charles  November 5, 2019

    Sounds like our community leadership has made yet another bad call. I’d suggest you take this up with our City Mayor, our City Council, our City Auditor and our Franklin County Commissioners. While you are at it….present your concerns to the new Columbus Public Schools superintendent as well as the in-coming Columbus Chief of Police. Wooops, that wouldn’t be very politically correct….they are all Democrats.
    Good article Jack. I’m certain the City neighborhoods would do well to get some “attention” but so many people think you simply throw money at these issues…..and they get better. Unfortunately, that isn’t so.
    It wasn’t that long ago the State Lottery money was going to create such a financial windfall for our schools….every problem was going to be solved. Somehow that didn’t work out so they tapped the casino revenues to bail out our schools and that too didn’t work out. Three years ago the City of Columbus home owners were hit with a 7-mil property tax increase designated for our schools.
    Some day I hope our city leadership looks at the core of our community problems and tries to understand what is failing. They might find out children without a two-parent family are vulnerable to so, so many unhealthy lifestyle issues. Faith based schools continue to succeed. Respect for authority and classroom discipline have fallen out side of most teachers goals and curriculum. Drugs and guns are way too accessible to our youth. Just a few of many thoughts….

    reply
  5. Amy  November 6, 2019

    I’m with you on this. Thanks for your article.

    reply
  6. Bill Lyons  November 6, 2019

    I wished the non-incumbent candidates – Joe Motil, Liliana Rivera Baiman, Tiffany White, and Scott Songratsomeboune – who were running for city council would have been elected. They are against most of the tax breaks that city council has sanctioned and are more in tune with the needs of the city, in my opinion. People have to stop just blindly voting the “official” Democratic sample ballot which keeps the entrenched machine in place that favors downtown, Short North, and Easton development over the rest of the city.

    reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.