Eliminating poverty requires new paradigm, mindset

Posted by:

Is the nation’s and Ohio’s poverty rate an inescapable fact of life or one we choose to ignore? The breadth of the problem is inescapable: 16.7 percent of Franklin County residents live at the poverty level—$25,100 annual income for a family of four—and the poverty rate has increased in every large Ohio city from 1999 to the 2013-2017 period. At last count, it’s 20.8 percent in Columbus and 36.8 percent in Youngstown.

If we want to fix the problem, there are plenty of things we can do: increase jobs through government investment in infrastructure, raise the minimum wage, invest in childcare, and countless other things. Coming up with ideas is easy. The challenge is with mustering the political will to execute those ideas. Doing so requires two fundamental changes.

First, let’s change our focus. We operate under the paradigm that what is good for those at the top of the economy is good for everyone else. It’s a top-down approach, and while it has some merit, the lion’s share of the benefit from government economic planning favors those at the top. Not nearly enough benefit finds its way to those at the lower rungs of the economic ladder. We need solutions that directly benefit those at the bottom.

Second, let’s disabuse ourselves of the notion that the poor are indolent and have chosen their lot in life. Sure, some have made bad choices—who hasn’t?—but poverty is rooted in lack of education, few opportunities and social barriers. Show me a family living in poverty, and I’ll show you several prior generations that lived in poverty. Poverty gets passed on because of a lack of hope and opportunity, an absence of positive models, and a fatalistic resignation that life will not get better.

As complicated as the problem is, resolving poverty comes down to three steps. The first is to make its elimination a priority. If we can put a man on the moon, we can end poverty, and ending poverty will require the same level of concerted effort.

Second, study the problem. Poverty is no different than any other problem. It has its own unique set of factors that create and perpetuate it. Rather than study those factors, conservatives embrace the idea they can help the poor raise themselves up by cutting the social safety net—an idea not backed by science. Until we understand as much about poverty as we did about various diseases we eliminated, poverty will not vanish.

We can gain some insight to the problem by looking at authors J.D. Vance (“Hillbilly Elegy”) and Tara Westover (“Educated”). Each grew up in poverty and dysfunctional families, but they beat the odds and went on to postgraduate education and successful careers. Despite their dismal circumstances, each sensed there was more to life than what they were experiencing at home. Let’s learn how to help others replicate their success.

Third, politicians have to muster the courage to take on the issue. Working to eliminate poverty means helping those who can offer nothing in return to politicians. That is, the poor don’t make political contributions. And offering a path upward for the poor means standing up to significant pressure from interest groups and conservatives whose focus is cutting the social safety net.

We regularly invest in the top of the economic ladder because doing so is believed to increase opportunity overall. In 2015, property-tax abatements of $300 million were awarded to developers in Franklin County. Last year, CoverMyMeds received $85 million in property tax abatements and income tax incentives because it promised to hire more than 1,000 new employees after moving from its current location to Franklinton.

What if the Franklin County commissioners and the city of Columbus made a similar investment in reducing poverty? What type of economic impact might that have in terms of reducing the need for and, thus, the costs associated with the social safety net and the increased buying power those rising up might have?

[This post was published as an op-ed in the Columbus Dispatch on
June 7, 2019.]

_______________________________________________

Jack D’Aurora writes for Considerthisbyjd.com

___________________________________________________________

5
  Related Posts
  • No related posts found.

Comments

  1. Jim Cowardin  June 10, 2019

    Jack, I hope you have a life jacket on or nearby, because you are way off the deep end here in so many ways. Where does the funding for “government investment?” If we smother the tax-payers, there will be no government funding to “invest.” You rage about the cities. Who has led the large cities for the past 30 years? Seattle, LA, Cleveland, Youngstown, NYC, Baltimore, on and on. I am sure they want to eliminate poverty. I am sure they have failed miserably resulting in misery for many using the approaches you list. The main achievement of Johnson’s war on poverty was to drive industry (jobs and opportunities to escape poverty) out of the country. Hello Youngstown. These policies really helped a once-thriving nation—hello Guatemala. Your notions may be well-meaning, but they are completely wrong-headed. Government “investment” in infrastructure is necessary but the employers are private firms who can only afford to hire workers for 30 hrs/week, because of stupid government rules. Because of the Unaffordable Healthcare Act they can’t afford to offer benefits. They have to do it this way so they can realize some profit, so they can stay in business and provide jobs. This president has reduced the jobless rate by clearing away government regulations. He has thereby addressed the poverty issue by enabling economic growth, the most direct way, in fact, the only way to reduce poverty. Unfortunately, we will never eradicate it.

    reply
  2. Dave  June 10, 2019

    Well Jack, your proclivity towards government social programs and taxing to achieve that is quite clear. Let’s take a look.

    1. Increase jobs through GOVERNMENT investment in infrastructure – Yes, we need lots of infrastructure improvements. All, or at least most, of those jobs require skilled workers. Please observe as you drive around Columbus’s massive infrastructure improvements and notice the equally massive lack of younger workers. Observe a residential home being worked on its exterior. Again there is a massive lack of younger workers. You can tell by the gray hair on all the workers. The problem is not lack of work (have you noticed the unemployment numbers?), but a lack of motivation and desire of younger individuals, especially young men to actually get properly educated or skilled.
    2. Raise the minimum wage? Guess what…that’s not necessary as many major employers are doing exactly that themselves. It’s a function of supply and demand. Capitalism tends to solve its own problems. There’s no demand for photo film? Kodak will go out of business. Jobs lost…OH NO. But instead many jobs have been created and the explosion of our economy occurred with digitization.
    3. Invest in child care? For sure, why not? It’s good for the future, everyone’s future. However be careful there. If a family decides to have eight kids, are we going to subsidize them for that decision?
    4. How to address these issues? Your first suggestion is merely word spinning…bla, bla…not enough money flows down through the system and that’s complete liberal bull and sensationalism. Your second suggestion deserves evaluation. Poverty is clearly rooted in a lack of education and the accompanying motivation. As an example, I know a second year university student at a prestigious institution. The student never wrote a book essay and actually never read a book in high school. Graduated with a 4.2 GPA from Columbus West High School. The student admittedly ever studied and is struggling, of course, at college. Don’t forget however that the decades of social programs have contributed significantly to the continuance of generations of families living in low education and poverty…the modern form of the Plantation Mentality. Pay them to stay poor, pay them to remain uneducated, pay them to stay in their place and for God’s sake, do not educate them.
    5. You want an answer? Beef up the funding for schools, beef up the competition for schools (not athletics, but academics) that go head to head with the established public schools. Re-instill serious discipline in public schools. IEP has its place, but have you ever visited the detention room at any high school in the entire area? A hell hole! That’s not discipline, it’s a holding tank. Have you ever visited a high school during the beginning or end of the day? Despite dress codes, which they all have, you’ll see boys in wife-beater shirts and girls in tank tops so skimpy they hide nothing. Security doors are blocked open so students can smoke pot, or worse, on the lesser side of the building complex. Students are on the phone or iPad during class and internet blocks are vastly ineffective. Frustrated teachers finally give up. The list could go on and on and needs addressed.
    6. By the way, have you taken into consideration the massive social infrastructure we already have to address poverty and the safety net? Apparently not. Anyone within the economic range you noted has assisted or public housing, has Medicaid, has food stamps and likely has Aid to Dependent Children and a myriad of other government programs, all part of the Plantation Mentality. Pay them to stay. Make it difficult to leave the government largess and work for a living. How about solving that Jack?
    7. However, no matter what you do, you meaning all of us, poverty will never be eliminated. Some people just do not want to work. Some just don’t want to do anything. Are we going to force them? Throw them in prison for not having a job or skill? One thing for sure though, if they’re paid to do nothing as AOC has declared, then they will in fact do nothing except get into trouble and end up in your prison anyway.

    How about this? GET REAL…GET EDUCATED…BE ACCOUNTABLE

    And, despite our differences of opinion, you’re my friend.

    Dave

    reply
  3. Pat  June 10, 2019

    We can’t “solve” poverty. And I say that because poverty is not merely the absence of material things, the absence of a good job, of a lack of quality childcare. Poverty is also a state of mind: it includes the absence of motivation; the absence of perseverance, the absence of a belief that one can succeed in life. And, right now, such beliefs or feelings are an entirely understandable, if not entirely justifiable, conclusion because of so many societal factors, but it comes down to this: I do not feel safe.

    Let’s take Columbus (or Cleveland, or Dayton, or Detroit, or Chicago, or LA, pick your city). Where are the worst schools? In highly urban areas. Why are they the worst? There are parents who desperately WANT their children to succeed, to make it where they could not, but generation after generation, it does not happen. Why? It’s not the teachers. I’ve seen them. They are dedicated, they CARE. But I’m not safe. My friends are not safe. We have NO reason to believe in our future. An African American student in New York told her teacher (whom she had come to trust): “Even my peers sneer at me for wanting to succeed: ‘So, what I’m saying is, when I walk to my house there are kids out there jeering at me. Oh, here she come. Here comes whitey. Hey, Doc, you scrape yourself and you find that honky skin? They call me “Doc” because I want to be a doctor.” [Teacher Man, by Frank McCourt, p. 194]. Why this attitude? Because the police and many African American neighborhoods don’t understand each other.

    The cops don’t understand the anger, see only excuses and victimhood. They get tangled up in specifics–Sir, here’s our standard operating procedure for traffic stops; Sir, I’ll look into your cousin’s case and get back to you…and they miss the raging subtext: WHY DO YOU TREAT US LIKE THIS? The [African American] community tells them what it thinks all the time, right out loud: this is a racist plot, the government’s bringing the drugs in–but law enforcement can’t hear it. They don’t really engage. They don’t say, ‘We’re as frustrated as you are.” They don’t say “Here’s why we drive by the [drug dealers] on street corners.” They don’t say We don’t get up in the morning to put black people in prison. That’s not why we became cops. We don’t hate your sons. We’re doing the only thing we know how to do.” And they (the cops) don’t dare say what they’re thinking: ‘They’re YOUR sons. What are you doing about it?”

    And all this makes the African American community angry, and then, silent, which may be the worst thing of all. When standing against drugs and guns and violence means standing with a race enemy, not many will stand.” (From “Don’t Shoot: One Man, a Street Fellowship, and the end of violence in Inner City America”, by David M. Kennedy, read the whole discussion from the last two paragraphs on p. 139, and then pp. 140-155. It is a searing indictment of misunderstanding and the consequences of it).

    So what makes you think some ‘government programs’ “beefing up funding” and all that are going to really help here? For all your talk about a ‘paradigm shift’ (I hate that phrase), virtually nothing you’ve said hasn’t been tried. And it all depends on ‘government action.’ From the “War on Poverty” of the 1960s (which was about as successful as the “War on Drugs”), the past 60+ years have been laced with good intentions, literally trillions in federal dollars, but insufficient progress.

    So what do I think will work? I’m a huge believer in David Kennedy. But in today’s political climate of more and more extreme behaviors and beliefs on all sides–I’m talking political sides here–it’s just not happening. To make things better, you MUST get the police and the African American community on the same page (I say ‘African American’ because they have the largest number of victims of any group of people in our cities. Why do I say this? Because any community, in order to succeed, MUST believe in its own future. Not one that is given to them (e.g. government handouts), but one that shows tolerance, shows understanding, shows compassion, and treats people fairly. People want to feel SAFE before they can believe in their own future.

    And, as Kennedy writes, the problem isn’t really based on racism–sure, there is some, but “cops haven’t written off black people. They’ve written off COMMUNITIES. The community of cops has written off the community of black neighborhoods [and vice versa]. And it’s all to easy to call this racism, and it is soaked IN race, but that’s not the same thing.”

    Kennedy notes the shooting of a 13 year old black kid in Chicago. The cop is literally cradling the bleeding child in his arms, softly begging the child to tell him who did this. And as the child dies, he says, “I ain’t telling you shit.” When you solve THAT problem, you will really begin to start solving the poverty problem.

    reply
  4. Bruce  June 11, 2019

    Jack, I will not pile on based on the current responses but do read good points being made all around.

    The Bible clearly states we will always have the poor to contend with. However, we are also called to love and serve them and I think that is to come primarily from more of a personal level and not government level. As an employer, I may hold a different perspective from others but my experience is jobs abound, training is available and social programs to help are abundant. Therefore there is somewhat of a disconnect between supply and demand that needs addressed from both sides. I understand that is a fairly general conclusion but need to get back to work….

    reply
  5. Christopher J Ritz  June 13, 2019

    Poverty will always be with us. We can throw money at it indefinitely but it will never go away.
    How about we start with increaing the dignity and status associated with two parent families. You see, there is no stigma attached to reproducing without the most basic means of support, a husband or a wife. That said, it is time for us to encourage our children to save sex for marriage.

    My father once told me a riddle, He said, “What to you call people who have sex?” The reply.. “Parents.”

    reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.