Civility—a strategy for change

Posted by:

Unless you live in a cave, you’ve probably read several articles about the demise of civility in our political discourse. There’s no question a problem exists. Jim Simon did a nice job discussing the issue in an op-ed published June 28 in the Columbus Dispatch.

He advocates a number of changes in how we behave, such as: insisting on “high-road behavior” from politicians; stepping out of our bubbles and being willing to listen to and understand those with whom we disagree; employers becoming ambassadors for civility by encouraging open discussions on difficult topics; and teaching young people the importance of kindness and respect for everyone.

I like what Simon has to say, but I think it’s easy to infer from his op-ed that he’s advocating civility for civility’s sake, as if we should practice it simply because it’s a virtue.

There’s more to civility than virtue. Civility offers the promise of change. Unless we move from a society where attacking the other side is permissible, we’re doomed to maintaining the status quo. Change requires breaking the cycle of caustic criticism.

Yet making the change is difficult. We lash out because we feel attacked. The trick is to realize that the dialogue is not about us but about ideas. Once you get to that point, you can say to yourself, “I’m not going to attack the people with whom I disagree. I’ll be tough on the issues, but I’ll be easy on the people with whom I disagree.

“I won’t reciprocate with intolerance, even if I just suffered some indignities. I won’t make politics personal. I’ll look for places where I can agree with people who view the issues differently. I won’t be oppositional just because my viewpoint is the minority position. Maybe there is common ground if I take the take to time to listen and understand.”

Remember what Stephen Covey advises. “Seek first to understand and then to be understood.”  The people at VitalSmarts, who conduct crucial conversations training, would say, start with heart!

What we need in terms of political discourse is no different from the strategies we employ in every day life. If an angry customer is yelling at you, yelling back will only make the situation worse. Dealing with a spouse who has lost his patience by showing an equal lack of patience makes things worse. If you reciprocate an angry co-worker’s bad behavior with your own bad behavior, your workplace will continue to be dreadful.

Civility isn’t just a virtue. It’s a strategy for change.

___________________________________

Jack D’Aurora writes for Considerthisbyjd.com

_______________________________________________



Also published on Medium.

6
  Related Posts
  • No related posts found.

Comments

  1. Dan McCormick  July 9, 2018

    Great article/opinion Jack..having many exchanges with people online, I’ll offer one interesting experience/tendency. Those that are not “anonymous” (and therefore they can’t be in hiding) are willing to meet/interact/exchange and focus on the idea. Those that are “anonymous” openly state that they will not meet with people that don’t think like them. They also, when faced with a concept/idea will quickly attack the messenger rather than the idea. With that said, I’m a fan of the ability to be anonymous..it has a rich history in our country’s founding. But when you point out this behavior, it simply results in those who do it doubling down on the attacks. If you can’ t win an argument with ideas, attack the messenger. Oddly, they are the first to blame all the problems on “the other party”.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  July 10, 2018

      I’m confused by your comment, Dan. You are critical of those who want to be anonymous–and for good reason. But then you say you prefer being in the anonymous group, even though your comment on the blog is anything but anonymous. What am I missing?

      reply
  2. Franklin Wilson  July 11, 2018

    Jack,

    I wish I could be more optimistic about the real possibility Americans becoming more civil with each other when discussing politics ; however, I am not leaning in that direction.

    1. The tribal nature of our polical positions makes it almost impossible to carry on a civil conversation with those who oppose each other.

    2. We live in a world where being an informed voter means you cherry pick information to support only your position and more importantly, you ignore information that challenges your thoughts.

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  July 11, 2018

      Regrettably, there’s good reason for your skepticism, Frank.

      reply
  3. Jim  July 13, 2018

    How can we begin to think anything about civility while we have a schoolyard bulling running our country?
    Look at last year’s NATO summit where our president physically shoved the leader of Montenegro out of the way so he could be at the front of the group. Now this year he has insulted nearly all of our long-term allies prior to this current meeting. Just last night while having dinner with the Prime Minister of Great Britain everyone found out how crass and ignorant he truly is as the article broke from the interview Trump gave to London’s largest newspaper. He sucks up to Russia, China and North Korea and tells everyone how great these dictators are especially Putin. He’s obsessed with Putin which makes no sense at all.
    Democrats are gutless sissy’s. Republicans have pushed them around on almost every issue for years. Democrats always bring a knife to a gunfight. They do that because they are actually trying to be civil and it doesn’t work.
    I believe we can be civil in everyday life but NEVER in politics. Remember, “all if far in love, way and politics”.
    Jim

    reply
    • jdaurora@behallaw.com  July 20, 2018

      Jimmy:

      You have accurately listed a number of Trump’s blunders, and there’s no excuse for any of them, but the breadth of his buffoonery is not grounds to be uncivil, even in politics. This is not to say we should tolerate Trump’s bad acts. To the contrary, he needs to be called out every time he does something stupid. Holding Trump accountable, however, is a different matter from how we should relate to one another in order to promote change. It’s pretty simple: anger begets more anger and accomplishes nothing. Trying to understand the other person’s point of view, listening closely and looking for common ground–well, that’s hard work, but it can result in change.

      reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published and your last name is optional.